
Optimum Club Assembly 
Kuykendall Golf assembles clubs optimized by applying physics equations.
This is the only way clubs can be scientifically correct. A patent by
Vance Elkins, Jr. issued in 1978 explains all the formulas in detail. The
patent has reached its 20 year limit and now clubs can be assembled using
science.
There are three ways to match clubs --
1. Every club feels the same when you pick it up by the grip and it hangs
vertically. In this case all the clubs have equal weight, e.g., total mass is equal for all clubs. M = S mi.
2. Every club feels the same when you hold it out horizontally. In this
case the balance points on the shaft from the butt end are equal for all
clubs. The first moment of inertia is equal for all clubs. 1st MOI = S li * mi
3. Every club requires the same amount of torque to achieve a specified
club head
speed. In this case 2nd moment of inertial is equal for all clubs. 2nd MOI = S l2i * mi
The Reasons scientifically optimum clubs have never been offered to you --
1. No tour player has ever played a club assembled in this fashion and they
still shoot great numbers in spite of equipment non-optimization. What
could they achieve if they played with optimized clubs?
2. You purchase hype for big dollars so manufacturers have no reason to offer
you optimum.
3. It takes several hours to assemble one club. Every component must be
optimized to within one gram. Big manufacturers could never afford this.
Why is Kuykendall Golf offering optimized clubs?
There is a demonstrable difference from the very first swing of the
superiority of optimized clubs. You hit the ball farther, and higher with
greater consistently. My pride and reputation are assembled into every
club made. Everyone gets optimum.
How can you tell if a club is scientifically optimized? Does it have the
physics-optimized-weight-energy-ring (Power) installed on the shaft? If
the answer is YES, you have optimized club.
If the answer is no, you do not.
Using copyrighted formulas, head, grip ,shaft, and power ring weight are
all optimized. There is a bigger gram weight spread between heads than
conventionally used. The formulas then specify the shaft length and the
amount of weight to be placed in the grip and on the shaft (The Power
Ring). If your clubs do not have the power ring, they cannot be
scientifically optimized. It takes about 2 hours to make a single club.
Every component must have the correct weight to within one gram. Both the
head weight and the difference between head weight is different from
traditional. This is proprietary techonolgy developed over the last three
years. Most shafts, after cutting, must have weight adjustments made to
them. All grips must have a specific amount of weight placed under the
grip. The final assembly is the adding of weight
to the shaft for The Power Ring. This is the correct way to assembly clubs.
Two assembly methods are used -- Optimum Feel and Optimum Distance:
Optimum Feel:
Clubs are balanced for total weight (all irons are the same weight - all
woods
are the same weight).
Clubs are balanced for the 1st moment of inertia - static weight (all clubs
feel the same when held at address).
Clubs are balanced for the 2nd moment of inertia - swinging weight (all clubs
feel the same during the swing).
Optimum Distance:
Clubs are balanced for total weight (all irons are the same weight - all
woods
are the same weight).
1st moment of inertia varies slightly (slight static feel difference).
Clubs are balanced for an optimum second moment of inertia (allows optimum
club head speed).
By optimizing the 2nd moment of inertia, I can allow you to hit clubs
specific distances and up to around 7% longer. This means that I can give
you exact distance between clubs and allow you to hit long irons up to 15
yards longer with the same swing feel.
Because the assembly is labor intensive, the prices charged must reflect the
labor cost. The cost of the clubs are:
| Irons: with steel shafts |
$125 each |
| Irons: with Aldila 60 gm graphite shafts | $150 each |
| Woods: with steel shafts |
$225 each |
| Woods: with Aldila 60 gm graphite shafts | $250 each |
If you are a long hitter, you should consider both methods. If you are a
short hitter, I would recommend the Optimum Distance method.
Shaft Lengths:
There are two shaft lengths used in assembly. One is for golfers who use
the traditional overlapping finger grip and the second is for the ten
finger hammer-palm grip. When assembled for the ten finger hammer-palm
grip, the clubs will be between 1 and 2 inches longer. When you separate
your hands, if you move your hand down on the shaft you lose between 1 and
2 inches of shaft length. The upper
hand must be moved up in order to have the same effective shaft length from
the head of the club to the right hand.
The following heads are used:
Irons:
IMA Heads (see Scigolf Full Swing page for photos)
| Features |
Blade size-
The size most tour professional use.
Easy to square at impact. |
Curved sole-
Shallow divot holes.
Easy to get through tall rough. |
Perimeter Weighting-
Resist twisting from off center hits.
|
Low Center of Gravity-
Designed to produce optimum trajectory. |
No Offset-
Designed for correct swing mechanics. |
Cavity Weighting-
Allows heads to be optimized to within one gram.
Allows physics formulas to be used to specify correct head weights
and shaft lengths. |
Woods:
The woods are the latest low profile maraging metal face technology.
(See Scigolf woods page for photos)
| Features |
205cc driver: Standard face
Back to the correct size for maximum club head speed. |
Low Center of Gravity--
Low Center of gravity get the ball airborne with ease. |
Maraging Face--
Hard, strong metal face produces more energy transfer and the sound is
incredible. Confidence grows with each stroke. |
Fairway Woods--
Shallow face.
* Get the ball airborne easily.
* Get through the rough easily. |
Traditional Club Design:
Traditional club designs work. However, they are not scientifically optimum.
This means that your equipment is causing you loss of total distance, loss
of exact distances and poor control of ball flight height. There are four
major problems.
The four major problems are:
1. Head Weight: Clubs have been assembled for over a hundred years with the
same head weights and head weight difference between clubs -- typically 7
grams between club heads.
| Iron:
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Head Weight (GMS) | 282 | 275 | 268 | 261 | 254 | 247 | 240 |
| Head Wt. Diff (GMS) | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
This limits shaft length and optimum weighting of the entire club.
2. Swing Weighting:
| Iron |
Head Weight |
Length |
Length 14" |
Torque 14" |
Swing Weight |
| |
OUNCES |
INCHES |
INCHES |
NON SCIENCE UNITS |
|
| 9 |
9.93 |
36 |
22 |
218.5 |
D1 |
| 8 |
9.68 |
36.5 |
22.5 |
217.9 |
D1 |
| 7 |
9.44 |
37 |
23 |
217.1 | D1 |
| 6 |
9.19 |
37.5 |
23.5 |
216.0 |
D1 |
| 5 |
8.94 |
38 |
24 |
214.7 |
D1 |
| 4 |
8.70 |
38.5 |
24.5 |
213.9 |
D1 |
| 3 |
8.45 |
39 |
25 |
211.3 |
D1 |
Swing weighting is the ratio of the head weight to the grip weight measured
14 inches from the butt of the club. It was started in the 1920's. It has
no scientific relationship to a golf swing. It completely mismatches
clubs. From the torque calculated above, you can see that longer clubs
feel and swing different from shorter clubs. Golfers just got use to this
feel and believed in it.
3. Frequency Matching:
Frequency matching is just an indication of shaft stiffness. If you get
the "S" curve frequency, all the shafts have a different stiffness. The
only thing stiffness affects is the height of ball flight. Stiff shaft
have a low trajectory. Flexible shafts have a higher trajectory. Getting
a set that has the right characteristics for you is virtually impossible
using frequency matching. The only advantage of frequency matching is for
quality control. The shafts are more closely matched.
4. Oversized Heads:
Scientific studies show that there are four major disadvantages to oversized
heads--
- They are open at impact due to wind resistance.
- They take a very wide divot. Fat shot are worse than with blade size
clubs.
- It is extremely difficult to get a ball out the rough. The head is too
big to get through the grass.
- With drivers, the head is slowed down due to wind resistance. This
causes loss of distance. If you put a smaller head on the same length
shaft, you will hit the ball longer.
For more information on Kuykendall Golf clubs and to order them email Scigolf.
Clubs |
Putting |
Short Game |
Full Swing |
Training Aids |
Schools |
Ask Scott
Ask The Professor |
Ask The Golf Shrink |
Ask The Collector |
Golf Rules Dictionary
Inside the Ropes |
The 19th Hole |
The Mind Game |
Golf Fitness |
Links |
Order Info |
Home
© Scigolf.com Company 2011 On the Intenet since 1977
|